Projects

Overview
Project Title	Licklider Transmission Protocol for CCSDS
Approval	Approved
Document Number	734.1
Charter	6.09 Delay Tolerant Networking Working Group
Document Type	Blue
Description of Document	<div>RFC5050 requires a reliable data delivery service between overlay routers.  While CCSDS has reliable data link protocols in TC and AOS, neither is well-suited for use as a convergence layer by RFC5050.  It is likely that any Delay Tolerant Networking protocol proposed by this group will need reliability on a hop-by-hop basis.  Thus this working group will also standardize a reliable hop-by-hop data delivery service that can be used by the Delay Tolerant Networking protocol specified by this WG.  The Licklider Transport Protocol (LTP) as described in the work-in-progress http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-09.txt was designed for exactly this purpose, and will be the initial focus of this part of the WG effort.</div>
Applicable Patents	There are no patent issues for this technology that are known by the CCSDS community
Patent Comments	None
Survey of Similar Standards Documents or Projects Undertaken in Other Bodies and elsewhere in CCSDS
Resources
Book Editor	NASA
Book Editor Resources	Keith Scott, The MITRE Corporation, for NASA Estimated resource (entire project): 8 months Estimated resource from FY13 to completion: 2 months.
Prototype 1	Other
Prototype 1 Resources	Leveraging NASA Tournament Lab TopCoder support to bring ION Open Source LTP implementation in line with CCSDS specification.
Prototype 2	NASA
Prototype 2 Resources	Keith Scott, The MITRE Corporation, for NASA Estimated resource: 4 months
Prototype 3
Prototype 3 Resources
Contribute	ESA
Monitor Only	CSA, DLR, JAXA, UKSA
Resource Comments

Schedule

Legend for Schedule Milestones = Required for Orange Books = Required for Green Books = Required for Magenta Books = Required for Blue Books Note - Red Books are Draft Blue/Magenta Books Schedule Milestones	Original Completion Date (Date in M/D/YYYY format.)	Estimated Completion Date (Date in M/D/YYYY format.)	Actual Completion Date (Date in M/D/YYYY format.)	Comments (Date in M/D/YYYY format.)
Project Approved	3/1/2008	3/1/2008	3/1/2008
Project Start Date	3/1/2008	3/1/2008	3/1/2008
Internal WG Review
First Draft Circulated to WG	3/15/2009	7/31/2009	7/8/2009
First Draft Comments Due	4/15/2009	9/15/2009	9/15/2009
Second draft circulated to WG	9/15/2009	12/1/2009	4/20/2010
Second Draft Comments Due	10/15/2009	12/31/2009	5/5/2010
Final WB Submitted to AD for Further Processing	3/1/2010	10/31/2010	1/31/2011
External Milestones
Secretariat Document Processing	3/15/2010	1/1/2011	2/1/2011	Approximate
First Agency Review	5/15/2010	3/1/2011	2/24/2011
RID Resolution	6/15/2010	6/15/2011	10/1/2011
Secretariat Document Processing 2	8/15/2010	12/15/2011	2/8/2012
Final Agency Review	9/15/2010	4/13/2012	4/13/2012
RID Resolution	10/15/2010	8/6/2012	8/6/2012	Last RID closure received 8/6/2012
First Prototype Development	3/15/2009	8/2/2012	9/11/2013	LTP prototype done and publicly released 8/2/2012
Second Prototype Development	3/15/2009	11/30/2013	7/1/2014	TopCoder augmentation of ION LTP to add authentication.
CMC Approval	3/15/2011	12/31/2014	5/22/2015	Approved by CMC Poll
Total Time to Complete (in months)	36	81